Share, email, print, bookmark SOURCE reports.

[broadstreet zone=”59946″]

ASHLAND – I am asking that the Ashland Historical Commission vote to deny the demolition permit for 10-60 Main Street.  The Town by-laws charge the Historical Commission to “… protect and preserve significant buildings in the Town of Ashland.”  

This mill complex is a magnificent structure in the middle of our downtown.  It will never be replaceable with proposed restoration and new apartment buildings.  The Commission must do its job to protect Ashland’s History.  Any thoughts about the final outcome of the property development and prior town involvement do not negate the Commission’s responsibility.

[broadstreet zone=”59982″]

It is very important to me, as well as many other people I know, to appreciate and value historic buildings, including mills. Once destroyed, they and all they represent are gone forever. In my view, there is no justification for destroying our history, especially for the purpose of profit-making by the applicants and developers.

Furthermore, it is unsustainable to demolish buildings in order to rebuild something in those places. It makes a lot more sense to consider redevelopment of the existing buildings with something that fits the size and scale of downtown while preserving the historic elements.

The current frenzy of proposed development in Ashland is destroying both the historic and pastoral character of Ashland. I don’t understand the desire and willingness of the Town to build more and more apartments. Personally, I would rather not live in a densely (over)populated environment where there is a shortage of basic essential services, an increase in traffic and pollution, and a loss of open space and a calmer ambiance.

Sincerely,

Margy Gassel, Ph.D.

Ashland

By editor

Susan Petroni is the former editor for SOURCE. She is the founder of the former news site, which as of May 1, 2023, is now a self-publishing community bulletin board. The website no longer has a journalist but a webmaster.