Court gavel and Gun Control text
Share, email, print, bookmark SOURCE reports.

In full transparency, the following is a press release from the Massachusetts Attorney General’s office submitted to SOURCE media.


[broadstreet zone=”59982″]

BOSTON — In continuation of her commitment to combatting gun violence, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell has announced her office is leading a coalition of 17 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Estados Unidos Mexicanos v. Smith & Wesson Brands et al.  

In their brief, the attorneys general describe the states’ interests in upholding public safety and preserving state-law remedies for misconduct by gun manufacturers and sellers. To further these interests, the coalition urges the court to recognize that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) creates only a narrow restriction on state-law remedies against the firearms industry. Under PLCAA’s plain terms, the coalition argues, gun manufacturers and dealers are not exempt from liability when they violate state or federal laws governing the sale and marketing of firearms.  

“To protect our residents from gun violence and promote common sense firearms safety, our states have each adopted laws and regulations that hold gun manufacturers and sellers accountable for how they market and sell their weapons,” said AG Campbell. “My colleagues and I are urging the First Circuit to remember that federal laws like PLCAA should be read to preserve the ability of states to hold wrongdoers accountable when they violate our laws and potentially put our residents at risk.” 

[broadstreet zone=”59983″]

The brief was filed in support of the government of Mexico’s lawsuit against seven U.S.-based gun manufacturers and a gun distributor. Mexico’s lawsuit alleges that the defendants designed, marketed, distributed, and sold guns in a way they knew appealed to drug cartels and violent gangs in Mexico. The defendants successfully moved to dismiss the case on the theory that Mexico’s claims were barred under PLCAA. The coalition of attorneys general had supported Mexico in the lower court, urging that court to construe PLCAA narrowly, and is now continuing that support on appeal of the dismissal.  

The coalition argues that, when Congress enacted PLCAA, it did so with the intention of striking a balance: exempting gun manufacturers and sellers from liability for harms inflicted solely because of third parties’ unlawful conduct, while also expressly preserving liability where gun industry members themselves violate state or federal laws applicable to the sale or marketing of firearms. PLCAA thus does not grant broad immunity for gun manufacturers and sellers and does not stand in the way of actions, like the one brought by Mexico, alleging that the defendants knowingly violated state or federal statutes applicable to the sale or marketing of firearms.  

[broadstreet zone=”59946″]

 The coalition argues that the state and federal statutes identified in Mexico’s complaint, such as the federal Gun Control Act of 1968, the National Firearms Act of 1934, and state consumer protection laws, are precisely the sort of statutes that the PLCAA says can be enforced. Since Mexico pleaded violations of each of these laws, the coalition argues, the district court erred in analyzing only the alleged state-law violations, but not the alleged federal violations, before dismissing Mexico’s complaint as barred by PLCAA. The coalition also argues that principles of federalism and respect for state sovereignty require reading PLCAA narrowly, so as not to deprive residents of state-law remedies more broadly than Congress intended. 

A full copy of the brief can be found here.  

[broadstreet zone=”53803″]

AG Campbell is committed to ending gun violence on both the state and national level. Last week, the AG’s Office co-led a multistate letter denouncing the decisions of Visa, American Express, Mastercard, and Discovery to walk back their commitments to implement a new merchant code for gun sales that would help prevent mass shootings and curb violence. In February of this year, AG Campbell filed briefs in two ongoing federal cases, Granata v. Campbell and National Association for Gun Rights v. Campbell, to defend and uphold common sense Massachusetts laws and regulations intended to protect the people of Massachusetts from gun violence.  

The brief, led by AG Campbell, is joined by the attorneys general of California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawai’i, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. 

[broadstreet zone=”56696″]

[broadstreet zone=”59984″]

By editor

Susan Petroni is the former editor for SOURCE. She is the founder of the former news site, which as of May 1, 2023, is now a self-publishing community bulletin board. The website no longer has a journalist but a webmaster.