Share, email, print, bookmark SOURCE reports.

In full transparency, the following is a press release submitted to SOURCE media. (stock photo)


[broadstreet zone=”59945″]

WASHINGTON DC – The Build Back Better bill passed by the House of Representatives today includes $95 million for local fire departments to purchase firefighting foam and gear made without the toxic “forever chemicals” known as PFAS.

“Firefighters are among those most highly exposed to harms from PFAS through their protective gear and firefighting foam, but many local fire departments lack the resources to switch to PFAS-free alternatives,” said Scott Faber, Environmental Working Group’s senior vice president for government affairs.

The Environmental Working Group is a nonprofit, non-partisan organization that empowers people to live healthier lives in a healthier environment.

Reps. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) and Dan Kildee (D-Mich.) led the effort to include the funding in the Build Back Better bill, along with nearly 70 other members of Congress.

[broadstreet zone=”59984″]

The $1.75 trillion legislation is a broad social spending spill that the Senate will now consider.

Studies show that firefighters have higher levels of PFAS in their blood serum than the average American. 

PFAS are linked to various health harms, including some kinds of cancerreproductive harms and reduced effectiveness of vaccines.

The exposures happen through the use of firefighting foam containing PFAS, called aqueous film-forming foam, or AFFF, and protective clothing treated with PFAS. Foam manufacturers knew of the potential health harms for years, yet kept them secret.

“Chemical companies and firefighting foam companies hid the risks of PFAS for decades,” Faber said. “As a result, firefighters handled the foam for decades without understanding the risks or taking precautions to limit their exposures.”

[broadstreet zone=”59983″]

Firefighter protective gear is also made with PFAS textile materials and treated with additional PFAS for water resistance, posing further risks to firefighters wearing it.

“The good news is that firefighters don’t have to use these harmful items, because alternatives that are free from PFAS are either available or in rapid development,” said Melanie Benesh, EWG’s legislative attorney.

Viable alternatives to AFFF are already on the market, and many meet rigorous international aviation performance standards used by airports all over the world.

As of April 2019, there were 90 fluorine-free foams available from 22 manufacturers.

[broadstreet zone=”59982″]

Several states have already banned most uses of AFFF, including California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York and Washington. Others, including California, Colorado and Michigan, have created take-back programs for the foam.

California, Colorado and New York also require manufacturers of firefighter protective equipment to disclose inclusion of PFAS in their products.

There are also promising emerging alternatives to PFAS in turnout gear and other personal protective equipment. Manufacturer Fire-Dex recently released new PFAS-free gear with a more sustainable water-repellant finish. 

[broadstreet zone=”70107″]

By editor

Susan Petroni is the former editor for SOURCE. She is the founder of the former news site, which as of May 1, 2023, is now a self-publishing community bulletin board. The website no longer has a journalist but a webmaster.